Neutronics calculation for AP1000 based on the fission response function

Long Xinxiang; Li Honglong; Zhang Yunxin; He Donghao; Peng Lianghui; Liu Xiaojing

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202638.250378

Article Contents

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2026 > Accepted Manuscript

Long Xinxiang, Li Honglong, Zhang Yunxin, et al. Neutronics calculation for AP1000 based on the fission response function[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202638.250378

Citation:

Long Xinxiang, Li Honglong, Zhang Yunxin, et al. Neutronics calculation for AP1000 based on the fission response function[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202638.250378

Long Xinxiang, Li Honglong, Zhang Yunxin, et al. Neutronics calculation for AP1000 based on the fission response function[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202638.250378

Citation:

Long Xinxiang, Li Honglong, Zhang Yunxin, et al. Neutronics calculation for AP1000 based on the fission response function[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202638.250378

PDF( 8141 KB)

Neutronics calculation for AP1000 based on the fission response function

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202638.250378

1.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2.
Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200233, China

Received Date: 2025-10-31
Accepted Date: 2026-01-09
Rev Recd Date: 2025-12-27

Available Online: 2026-02-13

Abstract

Abstract

Background
High-fidelity neutronics simulation of nuclear reactor cores, particularly those with complex geometries such as the AP1000, remains computationally challenging. Efficient deterministic methods that can achieve Monte Carlo-level accuracy are highly desirable for design and analysis.
Purpose
This study aims to develop, apply, and validate the FLASH code, which implements an advanced Fission Response Function (FRF) algorithm, for performing efficient and accurate full-core, pin-wise neutronics calculations of the AP1000 reactor core.
Methods
The FRF database was generated through reference-state simulations using the Serpent Monte Carlo code. To enhance accuracy in complex geometries, the methodology incorporated a local inter-assembly environmental correction factor to address fuel assembly heterogeneity and a predictor-corrector scheme to precisely simulate reflector environmental effects. The performance of the FLASH code was validated against reference Monte Carlo solutions under Hot Zero Power (HZP) conditions.
Results
The validation results demonstrated high accuracy. Deviations in the effective multiplication factor (keff) were within +220 pcm for all 2D axial slices and +209 pcm for the full 3D core calculation. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) was below 1.1% for the 2D pin power distribution, while the 3D pin power RMSE was 1.05% and the 3D assembly power RMSE was 0.67%. In terms of efficiency, the FLASH code completed the pin-wise full-core 3D calculation for the AP1000 in 106 seconds using 64 CPU cores.
Conclusions
The developed FLASH code, based on the FRF algorithm with integrated correction schemes, successfully bridges the gap between efficiency and high fidelity. It provides a rapid and accurate computational tool for AP1000 core analysis, confirming the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed methodology for detailed reactor physics calculations.
- AP1000 reactor,
- fission response function,
- inter-assembly environmental correction,
- reflector environmental effect correction

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	Walters W J, Roskoff N J, Haghighat A. The RAPID fission matrix approach to reactor core criticality calculations[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2018, 192(1): 21-39. doi: 10.1080/00295639.2018.1497395
[2]	He Donghao, Walters W J. A new fission matrix correction method to estimate the source distribution in nuclear reactor core[C]//2018 International Conference on Physics of Reactors: Reactor Physics Paving the Way Towards More Efficient Systems. 2018: 2042-2053.
[3]	He Donghao, Walters W J. A local fission matrix correction method for heterogeneous whole core transport with RAPID[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2019, 134: 263-272. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.06.008
[4]	Al Hajj W, Haghighat A. A novel fission-matrix based radial boundary correction methodology and its implementation into the RAPID code system[J]. EPJ Web of Conferences, 2024, 302: 13010. doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202430213010
[5]	He Donghao, Zhang Tengfei, Liu Xiaojing. The application of the combined fission matrix theory in fast reactors[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2021, 9: 766449. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.766449
[6]	Leppänen J. Development of a new Monte Carlo reactor physics code[M]. Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2007.
[7]	Leppänen J, Pusa M, Viitanen T, et al. The serpent Monte Carlo code: status, development and applications in 2013[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2015, 82: 142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024
[8]	Westinghouse Nuclear Power Electric Plants Company. AP1000 document cover sheet[R]. Pittsburgh: Westinghouse Nuclear Power Electric Plants Company, 2007.
[9]	Darnowski P, Ignaczak P, Orębski P, et al. Simulations of the AP1000-based reactor core with SERPENT computer code[J]. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 65(3): 295-325.
[10]	Franceschini F, Godfrey A, Kulesza J, et al. Zero power physics test simulations for the AP1000^® PWR[R]. CASL-U-2014-0012-001, 2014.
[11]	Roche P. The AP1000 nuclear reactor design[R]. 2016.
[12]	王一, 王瑞宏. 网格划分对裂变矩阵加速的影响[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2017, 29: 126018 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170234 Wang Yi, Wang Ruihong. Effect of mesh division on the fission matrix acceleration method[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29: 126018 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.170234
[13]	Duderstadt J J, Hamilton L J. Nuclear reactor analysis[M]. New York: Wiley, 1976.
[14]	Vázquez-Rodríguez R, Espinosa-Paredes G, Morales-Sandoval J B, et al. Averaging the neutron diffusion equation[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2009, 51(3): 474-484. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2008.10.007
[15]	Hua Guowei, Li Yunzhao, Wang Sicheng. PWR pin-homogenized cross-sections analysis using big-data technology[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2020, 121: 103228. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103228
[16]	Martínez L A, Hernández C R G, García J R, et al. Thermo-hydraulic simulation of AP1000 nuclear reactor fuel assembly[J]. VETOR-Revista de Ciências Exatas e Engenharias, 2021, 31(1): 60-71. doi: 10.14295/vetor.v31i1.13576