基于分块平滑投影二次重构算法的单像素成像系统

牟晓霜; 黎淼; 王玺; 梁文凯; 王峰; 理玉龙; 关赞洋; 余泊汕; 张磊; 高翊喆; 张佳杰

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202234.220190

基于分块平滑投影二次重构算法的单像素成像系统

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.220190

1.
重庆邮电大学光电信息感测与传输技术重庆市重点实验室，重庆 400000
2.
中国工程物理研究院激光聚变研究中心，四川绵阳 621900

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(61604028)

详细信息

作者简介:
牟晓霜，2016210786@stu.cqupt.edu.cn

通讯作者:
王　玺，xiwang@cqupt.edu.cn

中图分类号: O439
计量
- 文章访问数: 520
- HTML全文浏览量: 251
- PDF下载量: 61
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-06-06
- 修回日期: 2022-09-13
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-15
- 刊出日期: 2022-09-20

Single-pixel imaging system based on block smoothed projected quadratic reconstruction algorithm

1.
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Information Sensing and Transmission Technology, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400000, China
2.
Laser Fusion Research Center, CAEP, Mianyang 621900, China

摘要

摘要: 单像素成像系统是通过无空间分辨能力的单像元探测器来获取目标二维分布信息的计算光学成像技术，与传统直接成像技术相比具有高能量收集效率、高灵敏度等一系列优点，在高能物理诊断技术领域有着广阔的应用前景。针对实际单像素压缩感知成像系统在复杂诊断环境中存在的重建噪声较大的问题，提出并实现了基于分块平滑投影Landweber二次重构算法的单像素成像系统。根据算法观测矩阵分布特性以及数字微镜硬件输入要求实现了实际投影观测矩阵的变换，利用二次重构算法实现了单像素诊断的仿真分析与实验测试。仿真结果表明，在采样率为20%～30%的条件下，重建图像峰值信噪比大于20 dB，结构相似性高于0.8。进一步搭建单像素成像平台完成实验研究及验证，实验结果表明，利用二次重构算法模型对目标场景进行恢复的效果优于其余两种传统算法。二次重构单像素成像系统在采样率仅为20%的条件下能够重建出清晰的原始图像，具有较好的噪声抑制特性。
- 单像素成像 /
- 光学成像系统 /
- 压缩感知 /
- 平滑投影Landweber算法 /
- 观测矩阵
Abstract: The single-pixel imaging system is a computational optical imaging technology that obtains the two-dimensional distribution information of the target through a single-pixel detector without spatial resolution. Compared with traditional direct imaging technology, it has a series of advantages such as high energy collection efficiency and high sensitivity. In the field of high-energy physical diagnosis technology it has broad application prospects. Aiming at the problem that the actual single-pixel compressed sensing imaging system has large reconstruction noise in complex diagnostic environments, this paper proposes and implements a single-pixel imaging system based on the block smooth projection Landweber quadratic reconstruction algorithm. According to the distribution characteristics of the algorithm's observation matrix and the digital micromirror hardware input requirements, the transformation of the actual projection observation matrix is realized, and the simulation analysis and experimental test of the single-pixel diagnosis are realized by using the quadratic reconstruction algorithm. The simulation results show that under the condition of a 20% to 30% sampling rate, the peak signal-to-noise ratio of the reconstructed image is greater than 20 dB, and the structural similarity is higher than 0.8. The single-pixel imaging platform is further built to complete the experimental research and verification. The experimental results show that the recovery effect of the target scene using the quadratic reconstruction algorithm model is better than the other two traditional algorithms. The quadratic reconstruction single-pixel imaging system can reconstruct a clear original image with a sampling rate of only 20%, and has good noise suppression characteristics.
- single-pixel imaging /
- optical imaging system /
- compressed sensing /
- smoothed projected Landweber algorithm /
- observation matrix

HTML全文

图 1 压缩感知单像素成像数学模型

Figure 1. Mathematical model of compressed sensing single-pixel imaging

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 基于压缩感知单像素成像二次重构实验系统

Figure 2. Quadratic reconstruction experimental system based on compressed sensing single-pixel imaging

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 BCS-SPL算法流程图^[22]

Figure 3. BCS-SPL algorithm flow chart^[22]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 采样率30%时，不同算法对图像重构的效果

Figure 4. Effect of different algorithms on image reconstruction at 30% sampling rate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 不同采样率下SPL二次重构模型图像重建效果

Figure 5. Image reconstruction effect of SPL quadratic reconstruction model under different sampling rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 不同算法和采样率下图像重构的效果

Figure 6. Effect of image reconstruction under different algorithms and sampling rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 采样率30%时，不同重构算法间性能的比较

Table 1. Performance comparison between different reconstruction algorithms at 30% sampling rate

algorithm	SSIM	PSNR/dB	reconstruction time/s
BP	0.44	19.19	79.5
OMP	0.53	22.26	1.4
proposed algorithm	0.76	27.61	4.6

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同采样率下重建图像的PSNR和SSIM

Table 2. PSNR and SSIM of reconstructed images at different sampling rates

image	PSNR at different sampling rate/dB			SSIM at different sampling rate
image	10%	20%	30%	10%	20%	30%
“重”	19.46	21.60	23.66	0.61	0.83	0.86
“CQUPT”	16.90	20.44	23.19	0.56	0.80	0.82
rabbit	18.56	21.48	22.70	0.58	0.81	0.83

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 不同算法和采样率下图像重构所需时间

Table 3. Time required for image reconstruction under different algorithms and sampling rates

image	algorithm	time at different sampling rate/s
image	algorithm	10%	20%	30%
“重”	BP	161.5	566.7	1026.1
	OMP	0.9	1.8	2.9
	proposed algorithm	2.6	3.6	4.7
“CQUPT”	BP	155.5	566.6	1026.1
	OMP	0.9	1.8	2.9
	proposed algorithm	2.5	3.6	4.8
rabbit	BP	155.8	589.1	1204.3
	OMP	0.9	1.9	2.8
	proposed algorithm	2.6	3.8	4.7

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(29)

[1]	王峰, 关赞洋, 理玉龙, 等. 基于神光Ⅲ装置的光学诊断系统介绍[J]. 中国科学:物理学、力学、天文学, 2018, 48(6):48-58 Wang Feng, Guan Zanyang, Li Yulong, et al. Optical diagnostic systems based on Shenguang Ⅲ[J]. Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2018, 48(6): 48-58
[2]	Donoho D L. Compressed sensing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(4): 1289-1306. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
[3]	Candes E J, Romberg J, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(2): 489-509. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2005.862083
[4]	Candes E J, Tao T. Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encoding strategies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(12): 5406-5425. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.885507
[5]	Guan Zanyang, Li Yulong, Wang Feng, et al. Study on the length of diagnostic time window of CUP-VISAR[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2021, 32: 125208. doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/ac29d4
[6]	王峰, 理玉龙, 关赞洋, 等. 压缩感知技术在激光惯性约束聚变研究中的应用[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2022, 34:031021 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210250 Wang Feng, Li Yulong, Guan Zanyang, et al. Application of compressed sensing technology in laser inertial confinement fusion[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34: 031021 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210250
[7]	Duarte M F, Davenport M A, Takhar D, et al. Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2008, 25(2): 83-91. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2007.914730
[8]	李明飞, 阎璐, 杨然, 等. 基于Hadamard矩阵优化排序的快速单像素成像[J]. 物理学报, 2019, 68:064202 doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181886 Li Mingfei, Yan Lu, Yang Ran, et al. Fast single-pixel imaging based on optimized reordering Hadamard basis[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68: 064202 doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181886
[9]	马彦鹏, 王亚南, 王义坤, 等. 基于压缩感知的单点探测计算成像技术研究[J]. 光学学报, 2013, 33:1211007 doi: 10.3788/AOS201333.1211007 Ma Yanpeng, Wang Yanan, Wang Yikun, et al. Study of single-pixel detection computational imaging technology based on compressive sensing[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2013, 33: 1211007 doi: 10.3788/AOS201333.1211007
[10]	陈涛, 李正炜, 王建立, 等. 应用压缩传感理论的单像素相机成像系统[J]. 光学精密工程, 2012, 20(11):2523-2530 doi: 10.3788/OPE.20122011.2523 Chen Tao, Li Zhengwei, Wang Jianli, et al. Imaging system of single pixel camera based on compressed sensing[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2012, 20(11): 2523-2530 doi: 10.3788/OPE.20122011.2523
[11]	Wu Shaohua, Zhang Tiantian, Wu Bo, et al. Single-pixel camera in the visible band with fiber signal collection[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 17768-17775. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2819358
[12]	Wei Ziran, Zhang Jianlin, Xu Zhiyong, et al. Optimization methods of compressively sensed image reconstruction based on single-pixel imaging[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10: 3288. doi: 10.3390/app10093288
[13]	Mun S, Fowler J E. Block compressed sensing of images using directional transforms[C]//2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). Cairo: IEEE, 2009: 3021-3024.
[14]	Candès E J. The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing[J]. Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 2008, 346(9/10): 589-592.
[15]	Chen S S, Donoho D L, Saunders M A. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 1998, 20(1): 33-61. doi: 10.1137/S1064827596304010
[16]	Figueiredo M A T, Nowak R D, Wright S J. Gradient projection for sparse reconstruction: Application to compressed sensing and other inverse problems[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2007, 1(4): 586-597. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2007.910281
[17]	Mallat S G, Zhang Zhifeng. Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1993, 41(12): 3397-3415. doi: 10.1109/78.258082
[18]	Tropp J A, Gilbert A C. Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2007, 53(12): 4655-4666. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2007.909108
[19]	Needell D, Tropp J A. CoSaMP: iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2010, 53(12): 93-100. doi: 10.1145/1859204.1859229
[20]	苏杰, 翟爱平, 赵文静, 等. 自适应斜Z字形采样Hadamard单像素成像[J]. 光子学报, 2021, 50:0311003 doi: 10.3788/gzxb20215003.0311003 Su Jie, Zhai Aiping, Zhao Wenjing, et al. Hadamard single-pixel imaging using adaptive oblique zigzag sampling[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50: 0311003 doi: 10.3788/gzxb20215003.0311003
[21]	Gan Lu. Block compressed sensing of natural images[C]//2007 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing. Cardiff: IEEE, 2007: 403-406.
[22]	Van Trinh C, Dinh K Q, Jeon B. Edge-preserving block compressive sensing with projected Landweber[C]//2013 20th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP). Bucharest: IEEE, 2013: 71-74.
[23]	张赛文, 于斌, 陈丹妮, 等. 基于压缩感知的高密度分子定位算法比较[J]. 中国激光, 2018, 45:0307014 doi: 10.3788/CJL201845.0307014 Zhang Saiwen, Yu Bin, Chen Danni, et al. Comparison of algorithms of high-density molecule localization based on compressed sensing[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2018, 45: 0307014 doi: 10.3788/CJL201845.0307014
[24]	吴光文, 张爱军, 王昌明. 一种用于压缩感知理论的投影矩阵优化算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2015, 37(7):1682-1687 doi: 10.11999/JEIT141450 Wu Guangwen, Zhang Aijun, Wang Changming, et al. Novel optimization method for projection matrix in compress sensing theory[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2015, 37(7): 1682-1687 doi: 10.11999/JEIT141450
[25]	Li Shufeng, Cao Guangjing, Wei Shanshan. Improved measurement matrix and reconstruction algorithm for compressed sensing[C]//2018 8th International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication (ICEIEC). 2018: 136-139.
[26]	Wan Rentao, Zhou Jinjia, Huang Bowen, et al. APMC: adjacent pixels based measurement coding system for compressively sensed images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2021, 24: 3558-3569.
[27]	Kuusela T A. Single-pixel camera[J]. American Journal of Physics, 2019, 87(10): 846-850. doi: 10.1119/1.5122745
[28]	王之润, 赵文静, 翟爱平, 等. 不同正交变换深度Q网络单像素成像性能比较[J]. 光子学报, 2022, 51:0311003 doi: 10.3788/gzxb20225103.0311003 Wang Zhirun, Zhao Wenjing, Zhai Aiping, et al. Comparison on performance of deep Q network based single-pixel imaging using different orthogonal transformations[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2022, 51: 0311003 doi: 10.3788/gzxb20225103.0311003
[29]	Sun Mingjie, Xu Zihao, Wu Ling’an. Collective noise model for focal plane modulated single-pixel imaging[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2018, 100: 18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.07.005