Dalian Advanced Light Source beam dump radiation shielding design and thermal analysis
-
摘要: 基于蒙特卡罗模拟软件FLUKA和有限元软件COMSOL对大连先进光源(DALS)束流垃圾桶的设计进行了初步研究。采用FLUKA软件进行了束流垃圾桶和主体建筑的建模,理论公式和模拟计算保证径向和轴向束流垃圾桶沉积能量在99%以上,计算中引入减方差技巧,降低计算结果的统计误差,相应的计算结果的误差在5%以内。同时计算给出侧墙和顶板位置的辐射剂量率的大小,侧墙两边的剂量率大小分别为1.84 μSv/h和1.15 μSv/h,顶板位置处的剂量率大小约为1.14 μSv/h,保证了工作人员的安全与健康。利用COMSOL软件计算束流入射情况下束流垃圾桶的温度分布和热应力的大小,得到稳态情况下束流垃圾桶的最高温度为55.1 ℃,最大热应力大小为54.5 MPa,小于材料的熔点和屈服强度,保证束流垃圾桶在装置运行过程中的稳定性。Abstract: A preliminary study of the design of the beam dump for the Dalian Advanced Light Source (DALS) was studied with the Monte Carlo simulation software FLUKA and the finite element software COMSOL. The modeling of the beam dump and the main building was carried out using FLUKA software. Both theoretical formulas and simulation calculations ensured that the energy deposited radially and axially in the beam dump was above 99%. The reduced variance technique was introduced in the calculation to reduce the statistical error of the calculation results, and the error of the corresponding calculation results was within 5%. To ensure the safety of the staff during the operation stage, the dose rates at the side walls and the top plate were calculated using FLUKA software simulations, and the dose rates at the two side walls were 1.84 μSv/h and 1.15 μSv/h, respectively, and the dose rate at the top plate was 1.45 μSv/h, which ensures the safety and health of the staff. Using the finite element software COMSOL, the maximum temperature of the beam dump under the steady state condition was 55.1 ℃, and the corresponding maximum thermal stress was 54.5 MPa, which are less than the melting point and yield strength of the material respectively. The stability of the beam dump during the operation of the device is ensured.
-
表 1 石墨、铝和铜的物理性质和辐照特性的对比
Table 1. Physical properties and irradiation properties of graphite, aluminum and copper
material Z A density Ec/MeV X0/cm RM/cm R99%/cm L99%/cm Tmelt/℃ Top/℃ E/GPa α(10−6 K−1) σ0.2/MPa σu/MPa C 6 12.01 1.71 75.9 25.10 7.0 35.0 383 3800 500~600 13 7(6~8) − 60 Al 13 26.98 2.70 40 8.89 4.7 23.5 159 660 ≤250 70 26 200~400 80~120 Cu 29 63.54 8.96 18.8 1.44 1.6 8.0 30 1083 ≤200 120 17 150~400 60~100 -
[1] Decking W, Abeghyan S, Abramian P, et al. A MHz-repetition-rate hard X-ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting linear accelerator[J]. Nature Photonics, 2020, 14(6): 391-397. doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0607-z [2] Ishikawa T, Aoyagi H, Asaka T, et al. A compact X-ray free-electron laser emitting in the sub-ångström region[J]. Nature Photonics, 2012, 6(8): 540-544. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.141 [3] Huang Zhirong, Lindau I. SACLA hard-X-ray compact FEL[J]. Nature Photonics, 2012, 6(8): 505-506. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.184 [4] 徐玉海, 王光宏, 李哲夫, 等. 上海硬X射线自由电子激光装置调试用束流收集桶的设计[J]. 辐射防护, 2020, 40(6):510-515Xu Yuhai, Wang Guanghong, Li Zhefu, et al. Design of beam dump for the commissioning at SHINE facility[J]. Radiation Protection, 2020, 40(6): 510-515 [5] 吴青彪, 王庆斌. 用FLUKA程序模拟设计中国散裂中子源的束流垃圾桶结构[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 47(s1):996-1000Wu Qingbiao, Wang Qingbin. Using FLUKA code to simulate and design the beam dumps' structure of CSNS[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2007, 47(s1): 996-1000 [6] Jung N S, Lee H S, Oh J H, et al. Radiation shielding design of the PAL-XFEL[J]. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2015, 66(3): 425-431. doi: 10.3938/jkps.66.425 [7] Jung N S, Kim M H, Bae O, et al. Assessment of the radiation dose level of the PAL-XFEL hard X-ray beamlines under accident conditions[J]. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2018, 73(8): 1061-1067. doi: 10.3938/jkps.73.1061 [8] Liu Xianghong, Bazarov I, Dunham B M, et al. A high average power beam dump for an electron accelerator[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2013, 709: 37-43. [9] García M, Ogando F, López D, et al. IFMIF/EVEDA beam dump shielding: optimized design of the front part[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Particle Accelerator Conference. 2011. [10] Shi T, Sun D, Jovanovic I, et al. Optimization of the electron beam dump for a GeV-class laser electron accelerator[J]. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2021, 176: 109853. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109853 [11] Iglesias D, Arranz F, Arroyo J M, et al. The IFMIF-EVEDA accelerator beam dump design[J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2011, 417(1/3): 1275-1279. [12] Kamiya J, Saha P K, Yamamoto K, et al. Thermal analysis of injection beam dump of high-intensity rapid-cycling synchrotron in J-PARC[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2017, 869: 84-94. [13] Kumar V, Harvey M, Wendel M, et al. Thermal loading analysis of the ring injection dump for the Spallation Neutron Source facility[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2021, 1006: 165380. [14] 石澔玙, 王庆斌, 马忠剑, 等. CEPC直线加速器束流垃圾桶初步设计[J]. 核技术, 2019, 42:100204Shi Haoyu, Wang Qingbin, Ma Zhongjian, et al. Preliminary design of beam dump for CEPC-linac[J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2019, 42: 100204 [15] Maslov M, Schmitz M, Sychev V. Layout considerations on the 25GeV/ 300kW beam dump of the XFEL project[R]. Germany: DESY, 2006.