Application of MORPHY program in lead-cooled fast reactor
-
摘要: 铅冷快堆在燃料增殖和核废料处理方面的优势明显,针对欧洲铅冷系统(ELSY),基于“两步法”,使用蒙特卡罗软件产生少群组件参数,经过截面修正后,传递给确定论程序MORPHY进行堆芯计算。分析截面修正处理、角度展开阶数对计算精度的影响,量化比较ELSY堆芯的有效增殖因数、归一化通量水平以及控制棒组的控制棒价值。对于不同算例,采用输运修正和中子倍增效应修正,堆芯计算采用S4阶展开条件下,有效增殖因数偏差最大为38×10−5,控制棒价值计算偏差在45×10−5之内,归一化中子通量密度最大绝对偏差为9.73%,平均绝对偏差在2%以内,初步验证MORPHY程序在铅冷快堆物理分析中具备可行性。Abstract: Lead cooled fast reactor has obvious advantages in fuel proliferation and nuclear waste treatment. For the Europe Lead-cooled System (ELSY), based on the “two-step method”, Monte Carlo software is used to generate few group component parameters, and after section correction, it is passed to the determining theory program MORPHY for core calculation. The effects of section modification and angle development order on the calculation accuracy were analyzed, and the effective multiplication factor, normalized flux level and control rod value of the ELSY core were quantified and compared. For different examples, transport correction and neutron multiplication effect correction were adopted, and the core calculation was developed with S4 order. The maximum deviation of effective multiplication factor was 38×10−5, the calculation deviation of control rod value was within 45×10−5, the maximum absolute deviation of normalized neutron flux density was 9.73%, and the average absolute deviation was less than 2%. The feasibility of MORPHY program in the physical analysis of lead-cooled fast reactor is preliminarily verified, which is of reference significance for the subsequent development and use of the program.
-
Key words:
- MORPHY program /
- lead-cooled reactor /
- Serpent /
- program application
-
表 1 不同燃料组件的材料参数
Table 1. Material parameters of various fuel assemblies
fuel type mass density/(g·cm−3) enrichment /% mass fraction
of Pu-U/%235U 239Pu inner fuel 11.0049 0.4038 56.87 14.6 middle fuel 11.0092 0.4039 56.87 15.5 outer fuel 11.0236 0.4037 56.87 18.5 表 2 增加不同修正方法的keff计算结果
Table 2. The keff calculation results of different correction methods were added
method keff (MORPHY) keff (Serpent) deviation/10−5 no correction 1.02503 1.00790$ \pm $0.00009 +1713 transport correction 1.00392 1.00790$ \pm $0.00009 −398 (n,xn) correction 1.00656 1.00790$ \pm $0.00009 −134 表 3 不同SN展开阶数keff计算结果
Table 3. The keff calculation results of different SN expansion orders
Model $ {S}_{N} $ keff keff deviation/$ {10}^{-5} $ MORPHY
calculation time/(CPU·h)MORPHY Serpent $ {S}_{2} $ 1.00656 1.00790$ \pm $0.00009 −134 5 Serpent(2D) $ {S}_{4} $ 1.00797 1.00790$ \pm $0.00009 +7 12 $ {S}_{6} $ 1.00813 1.00790$ \pm $0.00009 +23 27 $ {S}_{2} $ 1.00476 1.00790$ \pm $0.00009 −314 5 Serpent(S) $ {S}_{4} $ 1.00531 1.00790$ \pm $0.00009 −259 12 $ {S}_{6} $ 1.00528 1.00790$ \pm $0.00009 −262 27 表 4 控制棒全提出三维模型keff计算结果
Table 4. The keff calculation results of 3D model with all CRs removed
model keff calculation results deviation/10−5 keff (MORPHY) keff (Serpent) all CRs removed 0.99572 0.99594$ \pm $0.00008 −22 表 5 三维全堆控制棒半插入模型keff计算结果
Table 5. The keff calculation results of 3D full reactor model with CRs inserted halfway
model keff calculation results deviation/10−5 keff (MORPHY) keff (Serpent) all CRs inserted halfway 0.97691 0.97729$ \pm $0.00008 −38 only CR A inserted halfway 0.99507 0.99486$ \pm $0.00007 +21 only CR C inserted halfway 0.99516 0.99514$ \pm $0.00007 +2 CRs A and B inserted halfway 0.99438 0.99454$ \pm $0.00007 −16 表 6 三维全堆控制棒半插入的反应性变化计算结果
Table 6. The calculation results of reactivity change of 3D full reactor with CRs inserted halfway
model reactivity of MORPHY reactivity of Serpent deviation/10−5 all CRs insert halfway 1881 1865 +16 only CR A insert halfway 65 108 −43 only CR C insert halfway 56 80 −24 CRs A and B insert halfway 134 140 −6 表 7 三维全堆控制棒半插入的通量偏差
Table 7. Flux deviation of 3D full reactor with CRs inserted halfway
model flux calculation results min negative deviation/% max positive deviation/% mean absolute deviation/% only A inserted halfway −6.57 2.97 1.60 only C inserted halfway −8.87 3.19 1.70 CRs A and B inserted halfway −9.73 3.11 1.76 表 8 三维全堆控制棒全插入模型keff计算结果
Table 8. The keff calculation results of three dimensional full reactor model with CRs fully inserted
model keff calculation results MORPHY Serpent deviation/10−5 all CRs fully insert 0.96911 0.96888$ \pm $0.00008 +23 only CR A fully insert 0.99431 0.99460$ \pm $0.00007 −29 only CR C fully insert 0.99440 0.99470$ \pm $0.00007 −30 CR A and B fully insert 0.99405 0.99429$ \pm $0.00007 −24 表 9 控制棒组控制棒价值计算结果
Table 9. The calculation results of CR worth for CR assembly
model CR worth calculation results MORPHY/10−5 Serpent/10−5 deviation/10−5 all CRs fully insert 2661 2706 −45 only CR A fully insert 141 134 +7 only CR C fully insert 132 124 +8 CR A and B fully insert 167 165 +2 表 10 三维全堆控制棒全插入的通量计算偏差
Table 10. The flux calculation deviation of 3D full reactor with CRs fully inserted
model flux calculation results min negative deviation/% max positive deviation/% mean absolute deviation/% all CRs fully inserted −7.68 1.62 1.81 only CR A fully inserted −5.39 2.84 1.62 only CR C fully inserted −5.68 3.43 1.78 CR A and B fully inserted −5.85 2.11 1.37 -
[1] Lake J A. The fourth generation of nuclear power[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2002, 40(3/4): 301-307. [2] 马栩泉. 核能开发与应用[M]. 2版. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2014Ma Xuquan. Development and application of nuclear energy[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2014 [3] 陈仁宗, 周琦, 朱庆福, 等. 小型铅冷快堆堆芯物理计算软件的开发与临界实验验证[J/OL]. 原子能科学技术, 2023: 1-10[2023-10-06]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2044.TL.20230905.1106.004.htmlChen Renzong, Zhou Qi, Zhu Qingfu, et al. Development of reactor physics calculation code and critical experimental validation for small sized lead-cooled fast reactor[J/OL]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2023: 1-10[2023-10-06]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2044.TL.20230905.1106.004.html. [4] 吴高晨. 基于RMC的连续能量蒙特卡罗均匀化与群常数产生研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2018Wu Gaochen. Research on continuous energy Monte Carlo homogenization and group constant generation based on RMC[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2018 [5] 杨鸣睿, 孙启政, 罗池旭, 等. 基于非结构网格输运模型的核-热耦合程序的开发与验证[J]. 核技术, 2023, 46:030601 doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.030601Yang Mingrui, Sun Qizheng, Luo Chixu, et al. Development and verification of a neutronics-thermal hydraulics coupling code with unstructured meshes neutron transport model[J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2023, 46: 030601 doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2023.hjs.46.030601 [6] Leppänen J, Pusa M, Viitanen T, et al. The Serpent Monte Carlo code: status, development and applications in 2013[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2015, 82: 142-150. [7] Zhang Tengfei, Xiao Wei, Yin Han, et al. VITAS: a multi-purpose simulation code for the solution of neutron transport problems based on variational nodal methods[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2022, 178: 109335. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2022.109335 [8] Xu Zhitao, Wu Hongchun, Li Yunzhao, et al. Improved discrete nodal transport method for treating void regions[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2017, 108: 172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.04.048 [9] 汪天雄. 高功率密度复杂堆芯燃料管理程序系统开发研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2021: 20-35Wang Tianxiong. Development and research on the fuel management code system for nuclear core with high power density and complex geometry[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2021: 20-35 [10] 吴宏春, 孙幸光, 曹良志, 等. 二维中子输运方程计算的角度多重网格加速方法及外推加速技术[J]. 核动力工程, 2008, 29(4):5-9,30Wu Hongchun, Sun Xingguang, Cao Liangzhi, et al. Angular multigrid acceleration method and Lyusternik-Wagner extrapolation acceleration technique for two-dimensional neutron transport equation[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2008, 29(4): 5-9,30 [11] 吴宏春, 杨红义, 曹良志, 等. 金属冷却快堆关键分析软件的现状与展望[J]. 现代应用物理, 2021, 12: 010201Wu Hongchun, Yang Hongyi, Cao Liangzhi, et al. Status and prospect of key analysis software for liquid-metal-cooled fast reactor[J]. Modern Applied Physics, 2021, 12(1): 010201 [12] Fridman E, Leppänen J. On the use of the Serpent Monte Carlo code for few-group cross section generation[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2011, 38(6): 1399-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.01.032 [13] Alemberti A, Carlsson J, Malambu E, et al. European lead fast reactor-ELSY[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2011, 241(9): 3470-3480. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.03.029 [14] Ruggieri J M, Tommasi J, Lebrat J F, et al. ERANOS 2.1: international code system for GEN IV fast reactor analysis[C]//Proceedings of ICAPP 2006. 2006: 10-25. [15] 田超, 郑友琦, 李云召, 等. 压水堆各向异性散射的输运修正方法研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2017, 51(9):1599-1605 doi: 10.7538/yzk.2017.51.09.1599Tian Chao, Zheng Youqi, Li Yunzhao, et al. Transport correction method of PWR anisotropic scattering[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2017, 51(9): 1599-1605 doi: 10.7538/yzk.2017.51.09.1599 [16] Yamamoto A, Kitamura Y, Yamane Y. Simplified treatments of anisotropic scattering in LWR core calculations[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2008, 45(3): 217-229. doi: 10.1080/18811248.2008.9711430 [17] Fridman E, Leppänen J. Revised methods for few-group cross section generation in the serpent Monte Carlo code[C]//Proceedings of the PHYSOR 2012. 2012: 3-8. [18] 蔡利. 考虑中子泄漏修正的快堆蒙特卡罗少群截面参数制作与验证方法[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2018, 30:026005 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170254Cai Li. Leakage-corrected fast reactor assembly calculation with Monte-Carlo code and its validation methodology[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 026005 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170254 [19] 杜夏楠, 吴宏春, 郑友琦. 蒙特卡罗方法在快堆组件参数计算中的应用[J]. 核动力工程, 2014, 35(s2):67-70Du Xia’nan, Wu Hongchun, Zheng Youqi. Application of Monte Carlo method in fast reactor assembly homogeneous constant calculation[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2014, 35(s2): 67-70 [20] 张滕飞, 殷晗, 孙启政, 等. 通用型中子输运程序VITAS应用研究[J]. 核动力工程, 2023, 44(2):15-23Zhang Tengfei, Yin Han, Sun Qizheng, et al. Application research on VITAS—a general-purpose neutron transport code[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2023, 44(2): 15-23