Comparison analysis of mono-static and bi-static radar cross sections for missile target

Gao Lei; Zeng Yonghu; Wang Liandong

doi:10.11884/HPLPB201830.170273

Volume 30 Issue 1

Jan. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2018 > 30(1): 013203

Gao Lei, Zeng Yonghu, Wang Liandong. Comparison analysis of mono-static and bi-static radar cross sections for missile target[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 013203. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170273

Citation:

Gao Lei, Zeng Yonghu, Wang Liandong. Comparison analysis of mono-static and bi-static radar cross sections for missile target[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 30: 013203. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170273

Citation:

PDF( 10477 KB)

Comparison analysis of mono-static and bi-static radar cross sections for missile target

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201830.170273

State Key Laboratory of Complex Electromagnetic Environment Effects on Electronics and Information System, Luoyang 471003, China

Received Date: 2017-06-30
Rev Recd Date: 2017-08-14
Publish Date: 2018-01-15

Abstract

Abstract

Mono-static and bi-static radar cross sections (RCS) of target reflect that whether the target could be separately detected by mono-static and bi-static radars easily. Currently, there is no quantitative index for comparison between mono-static and bi-static RCS. In this paper, definitions of RCS enhancement factor and RCS enhancement ratio of bi-static RCS relative to mono-static are given at first. Then, the two definitions are applied to analyze bi-static RCS of some stealth target and non-stealth target. The result shows that, the RCS enhancement factor is big and RCS enhancement ratio is high for stealth target, but the factor is small and the ratio is low for non-stealth target. Combined with meaning of the two indexes, it can be found that, utilization of bi-static RCS is helpful for detection of stealth target, but this effect is not obvious for non-stealth target, which is consistent with the understanding of the radar community. This also shows that the application of the above two indexes in comparison analysis between mono-static RCS and bi-static RCS is effective. In addition, according to the analysis result of bi-static RCS in narrow bi-static angle for stealth target, the detection effect can be improved when bi-static RCS in bi-static angle range from 20° to 40° is used.
- radar cross section,
- enhancement factor,
- enhancement ratio,
- stealth target

FullText(HTML)

References(13)

References

[1]	罗应. 隐身目标与雷达反隐身技术[J]. 舰船电子对抗, 2007, 30(5): 48-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCDZ200705014.htm Luo Ying. Stealth targets and anti-stealth techniques of radar. Shipboard Electronic Countermeasure, 2007, 30(5): 48-53 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCDZ200705014.htm
[2]	阮颖铮. 雷达截面与隐身技术[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1998. Ruan Yinzheng. Radar cross section and stealth techniques. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1998
[3]	李修和, 陈永光, 沈阳, 等. 电子战环境下双基地雷达对隐身目标的跟踪技术研究[J]. 电子学报, 2004, 32(6): 918-922. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0372-2112.2004.06.010 Li Xiuhe, Chen Yongguang, Shen Yang, et al. Tracking technology of bi-static radar against stealthy targets in EW environment. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2004, 32(6): 918-922 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0372-2112.2004.06.010
[4]	黄沛霖, 姬金祖, 武哲. 飞行器目标的双站散射特性研究[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2008, 35(1): 140-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDKD200801026.htm Huang Peilin, Ji Jinzu, Wu Zhe. Research on the bi-static RCS characteristic of aircraft. Journal of Xidian University, 2008, 35(1): 140-143 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDKD200801026.htm
[5]	张小宽, 刘尚钞, 张晨新, 等. 隐身目标的双基地雷达探测技术[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2008, 30(3): 444-446. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2008.03.013 Zhang Xiaokuan, Liu Shangchao, Zhang Chenxin, et al. Study on the detection technology of bi-static radars for stealthy targets. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2008, 30(3): 444-446 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2008.03.013
[6]	吴小坡, 时家明, 莫正攀, 贾宁. 双基地雷达对隐身目标探测区域的计算[J]. 现代防御技术, 2012, 40(4): 123-127. Wu Xiaopo, Shi Jiaming, Mo Zhengpan, et al. Calculation of detection coverage of bi-static radar against stealth target. Modern Defence Technology, 2012, 40(4): 123-127
[7]	赵小华, 渠亮. 雷达反隐身技术的浅析[J]. 现代雷达, 2007, 29(3): 17-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDLD200703006.htm Zhao Xiaohua, Qu Liang. Analysis of radar countermeasures against stealth technology. Modern Radar, 2007, 29(3): 17-19 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDLD200703006.htm
[8]	许学春. 隐身导弹与隐身技术的应用[J]. 飞航导弹, 2013(5): 87-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FHDD201305023.htm Xu Xuechun. Stealth missile and application of stealth technology. Winged Missiles Journal, 2013(5): 87-90 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FHDD201305023.htm
[9]	梁桂华. 战略层面的对决—俄罗斯Kh-555巡航导弹vs美国AGM129[J]. 现代兵器, 2005(11): 12-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDBQ200511004.htm Liang Guihua. Battle in strategical level: cruise missile Kh-555 from Russia vs AGM129 from America. Modern Weaponry, 2005(11): 12-15 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDBQ200511004.htm
[10]	文志信, 单洁, 潘峰. 美国新一代先进反辐射导弹[J]. 飞航导弹. 2011(2): 55-58. Wen Zhixin, Shan Jie, Pan Feng. The new generation advanced anti-radiation missile of America. Winged Missiles Journal, 2011(2): 55-58
[11]	王辉军. 双基地前向散射雷达目标跟踪研究[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2009. Wang Huijun. The disquisition of targets tracking in the bistatic forward scattering radar. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2009
[12]	陈新亮, 胡程, 曾涛. 一种基于前向散射雷达的车辆目标自动识别方法[J]. 中国科学: 信息科学, 2012, 42: 1471-1480. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-PZKX201211014.htm Chen Xinliang, Hu Cheng, Zeng Tao. Automatic vehicle classification based on forward scattering radar. Science of China: Information Science, 2012, 42: 1471-1480 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-PZKX201211014.htm
[13]	Suberviola I, Mayordomo I, Mendizabal J. Experimental results of air target detection with a GPS forward-scattering radar[J]. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 2012, 9(1): 47-51.