Research on transportation vibration environmental adaptability of coaxial pulse forming line

Fan Hongyan; Wang Junjie; Liu Sheng; Zhang Xuefei; Sun Xu; Wang Gang; Kou Lei; Hou Zhenyuan

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202133.210067

Volume 33 Issue 5

May 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2021 > 33(5): 055004

Fan Hongyan, Wang Junjie, Liu Sheng, et al. Research on transportation vibration environmental adaptability of coaxial pulse forming line[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 055004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210067

Citation:

Fan Hongyan, Wang Junjie, Liu Sheng, et al. Research on transportation vibration environmental adaptability of coaxial pulse forming line[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33: 055004. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210067

Citation:

PDF( 1308 KB)

Research on transportation vibration environmental adaptability of coaxial pulse forming line

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210067

1.
Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, China
2.
Beijing Zhengyang Hengzhuo Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100032, China
3.
Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China

Received Date: 2021-03-08
Rev Recd Date: 2021-05-15

Available Online: 2021-05-17

Publish Date: 2021-05-20

Abstract

Abstract

To evaluate the vibration environmental adaptability of Tesla-type pulse generator under vehicle transportation condition, simulation and verification test were carried out for the coaxial pulse forming line (PFL) with cantilever support insulators. An equivalent modeling was proposed for the inner and outer magnetic cores with laminated structure. The finite element model was modified according to the modal test results. Thus the effect of insulating oil on the modal frequency and damping of the PFL was studied, the stress and response of PFL under typical transportation conditions were obtained by simulation, and the vibration test of PFL equivalent parts was conducted to verify the simulation result. It was found that the structure of the PFL were nonlinear in the vibration test. The simulation analysis and the vibration test of equivalent parts verify that the existing structure of the coaxial PFL meets the requirements of vehicle transportation vibration environmental adaptability.
- coaxial PFL,
- inner and outer magnetic cores,
- insulating oil,
- nonlinear,
- transportation vibration,
- environmental adaptability

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	彭建昌, 苏建仓, 张喜波, 等. 20 GW/100 Hz脉冲功率源研制[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2011, 23(11):2919-2924. (Peng Jiancang, Su Jiancang, Zhang Xibo, et al. Development of 20 GW/100 Hz repetitive pulsed accelerator[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2011, 23(11): 2919-2924 doi: 10.3788/HPLPB20112311.2919
[2]	石磊, 朱郁丰, 卢彦雷, 等. 紧凑Tesla变压器型纳秒脉冲源[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2014, 26:125001. (Shi Lei, Zhu Yufeng, Lu Yanlei, et al. Compact GW nanosecond pulse generator based on Tesla transformer[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2014, 26: 125001 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201426.125001
[3]	Li Rui, Su Jiancang, Zeng Bo, et al. 5-GW Tesla-type pulse generator based on a mixed pulse-forming line[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2020, 91: 074710. doi: 10.1063/5.0008970
[4]	张喜波, 苏建仓, 潘亚峰, 等. 倍宽脉冲形成线[C]//第四届全国脉冲功率会议. 2015: A38. Zhang Xibo, Su Jiancang, Pan Yafeng, et al. Multiple-width pulse forming lines[C]//4^th Chinese Pulse Power Conference. 2015: A38.
[5]	Liu Sheng, Su Jiancang, Zhang Xibo, et al. A Tesla-type long-pulse generator with wide flat-top width based on a double-width pulse-forming line[J]. Laser and Particle Beams, 2018, 36(1): 115-120. doi: 10.1017/S0263034618000034
[6]	范红艳, 张喜波, 刘胜, 等. Tesla型脉冲功率源随机振动响应分析[J]. 现代应用物理, 2018, 9:031003. (Fan Hongyan, Zhang Xibo, Liu Sheng, et al. Random vibration analysis of Tesla-type pulse generator[J]. Modern Applied Physics, 2018, 9: 031003
[7]	杨万理, 李乔. 深水桥梁墩-水耦合作用计算模式对比研究[J]. 世界桥梁, 2012, 40(2):46-50. (Yang Wanli, Li Qiao. Comparative study of pier-water interaction calculation model of deep water bridge[J]. World Bridges, 2012, 40(2): 46-50
[8]	Xu Kunpeng, Sun Wei, Gao Junnan. Mistuning identification and model updating of coating blisk based on modal test[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 121: 299-321. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.11.029
[9]	龙吟, 任晓辉, 张珂, 等. 基于模态实验的轨道牵引电机整机有限元模型的建立[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2019, 16(6):1553-1559. (Long Yin, Ren Xiaohui, Zhang Ke, et al. Finite element modeling of rail traction motor based on modal experiments[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 1553-1559
[10]	杜平安, 于亚婷, 刘建涛. 有限元法——原理、建模及应用[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2004. Du Pingan, Yu Yating, Liu Jiantao. Finite element method—principle, modeling and application[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2004.
[11]	任超, 陈建均, 潘红良. 随机短纤维增强复合材料弹性模量预测模型[J]. 复合材料学报, 2012, 29(4):191-194. (Ren Chao, Chen Jianjun, Pan Hongliang. Prediction model for elastic modulus of random short fiber reinforced composite[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2012, 29(4): 191-194
[12]	常熠存, 耿悦, 王玉银, 等. 基于两相复合材料的再生混凝土弹性模量预测模型[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(12):165-173. (Chang Yicun, Geng Yue, Wang Yuyin, et al. Models of elastic modulus for concrete made with recycled coarse aggregate based on two-phase composite material[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2020, 41(12): 165-173
[13]	闫小乐, 谷立臣. 液压系统油液有效体积模量的在线软测量[J]. 机械工程学报, 2011, 47(10):126-132. (Yan Xiaole, Gu Lichen. Online measurement of effective bulk modulus in hydraulic system by the soft-sensing model[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 47(10): 126-132 doi: 10.3901/JME.2011.10.126
[14]	Gholizadeh H, Burton R, Schoenau G. Fluid bulk modulus: A literature survey[J]. International Journal of Fluid Power, 2011, 12(3): 5-15. doi: 10.1080/14399776.2011.10781033
[15]	王在铎, 马斌捷, 贾亮, 等. 水下附加质量及阻尼的试验研究[J]. 强度与环境, 2018, 45(3):15-19. (Wang Zaiduo, Ma Binjie, Jia Liang, et al. Experimental study of added mass and damping in water[J]. Structure and Environment Engineering, 2018, 45(3): 15-19
[16]	钱志英, 韩世泽, 马为佳, 等. 航天器振动试验中的频率漂移现象研究[J]. 航天器环境工程, 2018, 35(4):342-347. (Qian Zhiying, Han Shize, Ma Weijia, et al. Natural frequency drift in the vibration test of spacecraft[J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2018, 35(4): 342-347 doi: 10.12126/j.issn.1673-1379.2018.04.006