Circuit Simulation of GJB151B CS115 Part І: The analysis of calibration equipment indicators

Cui Zhitong; Chen Wei; Dong Yayun; Nie Xin; Wu Wei; Qin Feng

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202234.210406

Volume 34 Issue 2

Jan. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2022 > 34(2): 023002

Cui Zhitong, Chen Wei, Dong Yayun, et al. Circuit Simulation of GJB151B CS115 Part І: The analysis of calibration equipment indicators[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34: 023002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210406

Citation:

Cui Zhitong, Chen Wei, Dong Yayun, et al. Circuit Simulation of GJB151B CS115 Part І: The analysis of calibration equipment indicators[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34: 023002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210406

Citation:

PDF( 1134 KB)

Circuit Simulation of GJB151B CS115 Part І: The analysis of calibration equipment indicators

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210406

State Key Laboratory of Intense Pulsed Radiation Simulation and Effect, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, China

Received Date: 2021-09-10
Accepted Date: 2021-11-24
Rev Recd Date: 2021-11-25

Available Online: 2021-11-29

Publish Date: 2022-01-11

Abstract

Abstract

The composition and waveform of the calibration platform were defined in GJB151B CS115 for pulsed conducted sensitivity test, but the specific requirements for each device (pulse generator, current injection probe, calibration clamp, etc.) in the calibration platform are still not clear. To solve this problem, a time domain circuit model of the calibration platform was developed according the previous research on circuit simulation of pulsed current injection. By adjusting the parameters respectively, influences on the rise time and fall time of the calibration waveform caused by the inner inductance of the pulse generator and equivalent elements of the injection probe are simulated. Finally, the technical indicators for each device in the platform are obtained. This work is an essential supplement to GJB151B CS115 and is helpful to set up CS115 test platform for conducted immunity of electronic equipment test.
- electromagnetic pulse,
- CS115,
- conducted immunity,
- current injection

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	GJB151B-2013, 军用设备和分系统电磁发射和敏感度要求与测量[S] GJB151B-2013, 军用设备和分系统电磁发射和敏感度要求与测量[S]. (GJB151B-2013, Electromagnetic emission and susceptibility requirements and measurements for military equipment and subsystems[S]
[2]	黄华, 陈量. 信息系统装备电磁兼容性设计技术及工程实践[J]. 微波学报, 2018, 34(7):483-486. (Huang Hua, Chen Liang. EMC design technology and engineering of information system equipment[J]. Journal of Microwaves, 2018, 34(7): 483-486
[3]	曹斌, 蔡明娟. GJB151B与GJB151A对舰船装备电磁兼容性要求的对比分析[J]. 船舶, 2017, 28(3):72-78. (Cao Bin, Cai Mingjuan. Comparison analysis of electromagnetic compatibility requirements of ship equipment between GJB 151B and GJB 151A[J]. Ship & Boats, 2017, 28(3): 72-78
[4]	钟辉. 某机载设备电磁兼容性改进设计[J]. 安全与电磁兼容, 2018, 2:80-84. (Zhong Hui. The improved design of EMC for an airborne equipment[J]. SAFETY & EMC, 2018, 2: 80-84
[5]	MIL-STD-461E, Requirements for the control of electromagnetic interference characteristics of subsystems and equipment[S].
[6]	董佳, 姚利军, 余璨译. 一种CS115/CS116电流监测探头时域校准夹具的设计[J]. 宇航技测技术, 2017, 37(5):35-39. (Dong Jia, Yao Lijun, Yu Canyi. Design of calibration-jig using in CS115/CS116 current monitor probe time-domain calibration[J]. Journal of Astronautic Metrology and Measurement, 2017, 37(5): 35-39
[7]	徐亮, 胥明. GJB151B传导敏感度测试要求的分析[J]. 微波学报, 2016 (S2): 3 441-443 Xu Liang, Xu Ming. Analysis of conducted susceptibility requirement for GJB151B[J]. Journal of Microwaves, 2016 (S2): 3: 441-443
[8]	林荣刚, 凤卫锋, 梁双港. 注入脉冲激励传导敏感度测试的不确定度评定[J]. 电子设计工程, 2013, 21(17):86-89. (Lin Ronggang, Feng Weifeng, Liang Shuanggang. Evaluation of uncertainty in test of conducted susceptibility of injection impulse excitation[J]. Electronic Design Engineering, 2013, 21(17): 86-89 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6236.2013.17.027
[9]	Cui Z T, Grassi F, Pignari A S. Circuit modeling of the test setup for pulsed current injection[C]//Proceedings of 2016 IEEE 2012 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. 2016.
[10]	崔志同, 毛从光, 孙蓓云. 感性脉冲电流注入装置的PSPICE电路建模[J]. 电子学报, 2017, 45(6):1513-1517. (Cui Zhitong, Mao Congguang, Sun Beiyun. SPICE modeling of pulsed current injection with inductive coupling[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2017, 45(6): 1513-1517 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2017.06.033
[11]	Cui Z T, Wei B, Grassi F, Pignari A S. A pulsed current injection setup and procedure to reproduce intense transient electromagnetic disturbance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2018, 60(6): 2065-2068. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2017.2789206
[12]	Cui Z T, Wei B, Grassi F, Pignari A S. Experimental analysis and circuit modeling of pulsed current injection in wire pairs[C]//Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. 2018.
[13]	崔志同, 魏兵. 同轴电缆感性脉冲电流注入试验仿真方法[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2021, 48(4):42-49. (Cui Zhitong, Wei Bing. Simulation methods for inductive pulsed current injection on coaxial cable[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2021, 48(4): 42-49
[14]	Lofon F, Belakhouy Y, Daran F. Injection probe modeling for bulk current injection test on multiconductor transmission lines[C]//Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Embedded Electromagnetic Compatibility. 2007.
[15]	崔志同. HEMP脉冲电流注入的仿真与实验研究[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2020 Cui Zhitong. Simulation and experimental research on HEMP pulsed current injection[D]. Xi’An: Xidian University, 2020