Volume 34 Issue 6
Apr.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Yuan Ye, Zhang Yan, Zhao Qing, et al. Numerical study on the characteristics of an arc jet plasma actuator[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34: 065003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210527
Citation: Yuan Ye, Zhang Yan, Zhao Qing, et al. Numerical study on the characteristics of an arc jet plasma actuator[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34: 065003. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210527

Numerical study on the characteristics of an arc jet plasma actuator

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210527
  • Received Date: 2021-11-26
  • Accepted Date: 2022-03-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2022-02-26
  • Available Online: 2022-03-21
  • Publish Date: 2022-06-15
  • An arc jet plasma actuator was designed for drag reduction of hypersonic vehicle to achieve better drag reduction effect. The characteristics of the arc jet plasma actuator were simulated numerically by using the finite element method to solve the nonlinear multiple physical equations, and the distributions of potential, pressure, temperature and velocity inside the actuator were obtained, and the influencing effects of velocity at the inlet, current, radius of the pipe on the distributions of potential, pressure, temperature and velocity were analyzed comprehensively. The comprehensive influence laws are obtained, and the simulation shows that the arc jet plasma actuator can produce a plasma jet with a maximum temperature of 8638 K and a maximum velocity of 655 m/s. The minimum power is required when the inlet gas velocity is the least, the maximum average temperature at the exit is obtained when the plasma current is the largest and the inlet gas velocity is medium. The maximum average speed at the exit is obtained at the largest current and the largest inlet gas velocity. Validation by experiment is also carried out. Comparison between the experimental and simulation results also show good agreement under similar plasma parameters.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Dorier J L, Gindrat M, Hollenstein C, et al. Time-resolved imaging of anodic arc root behavior during fluctuations of a DC plasma spraying torch[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2001, 29(3): 494-501. doi: 10.1109/27.928947
    [2]
    Ghorui S, Sahasrabudhe S N, Murthy P S S, et al. A dc arc plasma torch as a tailored heat source for thermohydraulic simulation of proton beam–target interaction in ADSS[J]. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2006, 15(4): 689-694. doi: 10.1088/0963-0252/15/4/013
    [3]
    Bhuyan P J, Goswami K S. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional simulation of DC plasma torches[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2007, 35(6): 1781-1786. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2007.910214
    [4]
    Kavka T, Matějíček J, Ctibor P, et al. Plasma spraying of copper by hybrid water-gas DC arc plasma torch[J]. Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, 2011, 20(4): 760-774. doi: 10.1007/s11666-011-9633-1
    [5]
    Zhao Yizhe, Su Yilin, Hou Xuyan, et al. Directional sliding of water: biomimetic snake scale surfaces[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2021, 4: 210008. doi: 10.29026/oea.2021.210008
    [6]
    Bublievsky A F, Gorbunov A V, Marquesi A R, et al. Generalization of the total current–voltage characteristics for transferred arc plasma torch with steam and air plasmas based on the analytical anisotropic model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2015, 43(10): 3707-3715. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2015.2469675
    [7]
    Mavier F, Rat V, Coudert J F. Influence of time-modulation of applied current on arc stability in DC pulsed plasma spray torch[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2017, 45(4): 565-573. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2016.2631894
    [8]
    Ondac P, Maslani A, Hrabovsky M, et al. Measurement of anode arc attachment movement in DC arc plasma torch at atmospheric pressure[J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2018, 38(3): 637-654. doi: 10.1007/s11090-018-9888-0
    [9]
    Sun Qiang, Liu Yonghong, Han Yancong, et al. A novel experimental method of investigating anode-arc-root behaviors in a DC non-transferred arc plasma torch[J]. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2020, 29: 025008. doi: 10.1088/1361-6595/ab652e
    [10]
    Pan Zihan, Ye Lei, Qian Shulou, et al. Comparison of Reynolds average Navier–Stokes turbulence models in numerical simulations of the DC arc plasma torch[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2020, 22: 025401. doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab4f00
    [11]
    Huang Heji, Pan Wenxia, Wu Chengkang. Arc root motion in an argon-hydrogen DC plasma torch[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2008, 36(4): 1050-1051.
    [12]
    Lebouvier A, Delalondre C, Fresnet F, et al. Three-dimensional unsteady MHD modeling of a low-current high-voltage nontransferred DC plasma torch operating with air[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2011, 39(9): 1889-1899. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2011.2160208
    [13]
    Liang Peng, Groll R. Numerical study of plasma–electrode interaction during arc discharge in a DC plasma torch[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2018, 46(2): 363-372. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2017.2786079
    [14]
    Xu Xiaowen, Yang Shiyou, Zhou Qiang, et al. A 2-D axisymmetric magneto-hydrodynamic model of a DC arc plasma torch and its solution methodology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2020, 56: 7503904.
    [15]
    Sun Jianghong, Sun Surong, Zhang Lihui, et al. Two-temperature chemical non-equilibrium modeling of argon DC arc plasma torch[J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2020, 40(6): 1383-1400. doi: 10.1007/s11090-020-10108-9
    [16]
    Chinè B. A 2D model of a plasma torch[C]//Excerpt from the Proceedings of the 2016 COMSOL Conference in Munich. 2016.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(2)

    Article views (560) PDF downloads(32) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return