Analysis of tritium source term in an integrated small reactor

Chen Zhihong

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202537.250061

Article Contents

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2025 > Corrected proofs

Chen Zhihong. Analysis of tritium source term in an integrated small reactor[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202537.250061

Citation:

Chen Zhihong. Analysis of tritium source term in an integrated small reactor[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202537.250061

Chen Zhihong. Analysis of tritium source term in an integrated small reactor[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202537.250061

Citation:

Chen Zhihong. Analysis of tritium source term in an integrated small reactor[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202537.250061

PDF( 826 KB)

Analysis of tritium source term in an integrated small reactor

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202537.250061

Chen Zhihong

China Nuclear Power Engineering Co, Ltd, Shenzhen 518124, China

Received Date: 2025-04-03
Accepted Date: 2025-07-20
Rev Recd Date: 2025-07-14

Available Online: 2025-07-23

Abstract

Abstract

Background
Tritium production pathways are well-established for large pressurized water reactors (PWRs). Integrated small reactors (ISRs), however, operate without soluble boron reactivity control and use no chemical additives (e.g., lithium hydroxide) for pH adjustment, necessitating dedicated analysis of their tritium sources.
Purpose
This study aims to identify tritium production pathways in ISRs, establish a computational model for quantifying tritium source terms, and propose design optimizations to minimize tritium generation.
Methods
A theoretical model was established by solving differential equations for tritium production and removal based on identified neutron activation reaction mechanisms. Key parameters included neutron flux and nuclear cross-sections derived from Monte Carlo simulations of the ISR core. Validation was performed against normalized operational tritium release data from boiling water reactors (BWRs) with analogous B₄C control rods and Sb-Be neutron sources, considering thermal power and load factors.
Results
The annual tritium production in ISR primary coolant is 1.81 TBq. The primary contributors are neutron-activated products from Sb-Be and B₄C material, accounting for 46% and 51% of the total production, respectively. Analysis of tritium discharge data from operational BWRs validates the conservatism of the theoretical results.
Conclusions
Optimizing secondary neutron sources (canceling Sb-Be or using double-encapsulated cladding) and replacing B₄C control rods with non-tritium-producing absorbers (e.g., Ag-In-Cd or hafnium) could reduce ISR tritium production significantly. These measures are technically feasible based on PWRs operational experience and are recommended for ISR design enhancements. Future work will refine release fractions of control rods using plant-specific operational data.
- integrated small reactor,
- tritium source term,
- control rod absorber,
- secondary neutron source,
- double-encapsulated cladding

FullText(HTML)

References(28)

References

[1]	IAEA. Management of waste containing tritium and carbon-14[R]. Technical Report Series No. 421, 2004: 28-35.
[2]	Peterson Jr H T, Baker D A. Tritium production, releases and population doses at nuclear power reactors[J]. Fusion Technology, 1985, 8(2P2): 2544-2550. doi: 10.13182/FST8-2544
[3]	杨茂春. 压水堆核电站氚的辐射风险分析[J]. 辐射防护通讯, 2000, 20(3): 1-6 Yang Maochun. Radiation risk analysis of tritium in PWR nuclear power plants[J]. Radiation Protection Bulletin, 2000, 20(3): 1-6
[4]	GB 6249-2025, 核动力厂环境辐射防护规定[S] GB 6249-2025, Regulations for environmental radiation protection of nuclear power plant[S]
[5]	郭庆洋, 张竞宇, 孙业帅, 等. 压水堆主冷却剂中氚源项计算分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(12): 2113-2117 Guo Qingyang, Zhang Jingyu, Sun Yeshuai, et al. Calculation analysis of tritium source term in PWR[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2018, 52(12): 2113-2117
[6]	黎辉, 梅其良, 付亚茹. 核电厂氚的产生和排放分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2015, 49(4): 739-743 Li Hui, Mei Qiliang, Fu Yaru. Analyses of generation and release of tritium in nuclear power plant[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2015, 49(4): 739-743
[7]	杨昭林, 王亮, 周永海, 等. 压水堆核电厂氚排放源项的计算及验证[J]. 核科学与工程, 2020, 40(3): 359-366 Yang Zhaolin, Wang Liang, Zhou Yonghai, et al. Calculation and verification of tritium release for PWR nuclear power plants[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2020, 40(3): 359-366
[8]	付鹏涛, 蔡德昌, 李志军. 基于CPR1000的压水堆氚排放量研究[C]//第十七届反应堆数值计算与粒子输运学术会议CORPHY暨2018年反应堆物理会议(CORPHY-2018). 2018 Fu Pengtao, Cai Dechang, Li Zhijun. Study of tritium production based on CPR1000 discharge[C]//CORPHY-2018.2018
[9]	付鹏涛, 代明亮, 祝兆文, 等. 基于运行反馈的压水堆氚排放量研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2022, 34: 026009 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210399 Fu Pengtao, Dai Mingliang, Zhu Zhaowen, et al. Study of annual tritium discharge in pressurized water reactor based on historical data[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34: 026009 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210399
[10]	王奇. 取消次级中子源对压水堆氚源项的影响分析[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2023, 35: 116004 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202335.230096 Wang Qi. Analysis of influence of canceling secondary neutron sources on tritium source terms in pressurized water reactors[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2023, 35: 116004 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202335.230096
[11]	张作义, 张亚军, 贾海军. 低温核供热堆关键技术[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2023 Zhang Zuoyi, Zhang Yajun, Jia Haijun. Key technologies of low-temperature nuclear heating reactors[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2023
[12]	Chretien V, Le Guen B. Rejets de tritium et impact autour des centrales EDF[C]//Proceedings of Tritium Conference in Paris France. 2009: 23-24.
[13]	Andrieu C, Ravel S, Ducros G, et al. Release of fission tritium through zircaloy-4 fuel cladding tubes[J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2005, 347(1/2): 12-19.
[14]	Ray J W. Tritium in power reactors[J]. Reactor and Fuel Processing Technology, 1968-1969, 12(1): 19-26.
[15]	James M, Smith Jr. The significance of tritium in water reactors, GE, aped, 9/19/67.
[16]	Joseph W, Ray, et al. Investigation pf tritium generation and release in PM nuclear power plants, BMI-1787, 10/31/66.
[17]	Kearns J J. Terminal solubility and partitioning of hydrogen in the alpha phase of zirconium, Zircaloy-2 and Zircaloy-4[J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 1967, 22(3): 292-303. doi: 10.1016/0022-3115(67)90047-5
[18]	U. S. NRC. Arkansas nuclear one, unit 2, safety analysis report, amendment 31[R]. ML23324A028, 2023.
[19]	U. S. NRC. Columbia generating station, final safety analysis report amendment 67[R]. ML23346A215, 2024.
[20]	U. S. NRC. Millstone power station, unit 2, revision 41 to updated final safety analysis report, chapter 11, radioactive waste processing and radiation protection systems[R]. ML23193A875, 2023.
[21]	U. S. NRC. Perry nuclear power plant, supplemental information for revision 22 to updated safety analysis report, chapter 11, radioactive waste management[R]. ML21361A199, 2021.
[22]	U. S. NRC. Radioactive effluent and environmental reports[EB/OL]. 2025[2025-03-08]. https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/tritium/plant-info.
[23]	U. S. NRC. List of power reactor units[EB/OL]. 2025[2025-03-08]. https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/list-power-reactor-units.
[24]	U. S. NRC. Operating time[EB/OL]. 2025[2025-03-08]. https://nrcoe.inl.gov/ReactorYears.
[25]	陈志宏, 李志勇, 沈季, 等. 某型反应堆启动中子源设计研究[J]. 核科学与工程, 2024, 44(6): 1215-1225 Chen Zhihong, Li Zhiyong, Shen Ji, et al. Design of the start-up neutron source for a reactor[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2024, 44(6): 1215-1225
[26]	章安龙. 反应堆无二次中子源装料和启动[J]. 核科学与工程, 2019, 39(3): 345-349 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0918.2019.03.002 Zhang Anlong. Reactor reloading and startup without secondary neutron source[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2019, 39(3): 345-349 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0918.2019.03.002
[27]	杨嗣, 沈亚杰, 高永恒, 等. CNP600机组替代二次中子源装料及无源临界[J]. 中国核电, 2021, 14(1): 123-128 Yang Si, Shen Yajie, Gao Yongheng, et al. Reactor reloading with replacement of secondary neutron source and criticality without neutron source in CNP600 nuclear power plant[J]. China Nuclear Power, 2021, 14(1): 123-128
[28]	肖会文, 李想, 刘国明, 等. “华龙一号”取消二次中子源研究[J]. 现代应用物理, 2023, 14: 040401 doi: 10.12061/j.issn.2095-6223.2023.040401 Xiao Huiwen, Li Xiang, Liu Guoming, et al. The removal of secondary neutron source in HPR1000[J]. Modern Applie Physics, 2023, 14: 040401 doi: 10.12061/j.issn.2095-6223.2023.040401