Experimental study on two-phase flow in rod bundle channels based on wire mesh sensor

Long Pengchen; Shi Haopeng; Zhao Meng; Cheng Yixuan

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202537.240192

Volume 37 Issue 1

Dec. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > High Power Laser and Particle Beams > 2025 > 37(1): 016002

Long Pengchen, Shi Haopeng, Zhao Meng, et al. Experimental study on two-phase flow in rod bundle channels based on wire mesh sensor[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2025, 37: 016002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202537.240192

Citation:

Long Pengchen, Shi Haopeng, Zhao Meng, et al. Experimental study on two-phase flow in rod bundle channels based on wire mesh sensor[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2025, 37: 016002. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202537.240192

Citation:

PDF( 1894 KB)

Experimental study on two-phase flow in rod bundle channels based on wire mesh sensor

doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202537.240192

1.
School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2.
College of Smart Energy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received Date: 2024-06-07
Accepted Date: 2024-12-04
Rev Recd Date: 2024-12-04

Available Online: 2024-12-14

Publish Date: 2025-12-13

Abstract

Abstract

To study the characteristics and evolution of the gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern in the rod bundle channel of pressurized water reactor, based on the double-layer wire mesh sensor, the air-water two-phase flow pattern experiment of the 3×3 rod bundle channels was carried out at room temperature and pressure. The flow patterns include bubble flow, cap flow and slug flow. The experimental results show that, the critical bubble diameter range for the reversal of lateral lift direction under normal temperature and pressure is 4 to 5.8 mm. In addition, for bubbly flow, the time-averaged void fraction exhibits a “wall peak” distribution at lower superficial gas velocities and a “central peak” distribution at higher superficial gas velocities. For the cap flow, the cross distribution of cap shaped bubbles within adjacent subchannels triggers large-scale mixing of the liquid phase between adjacent subchannels, and the time-averaged void fraction exhibits a “central peak” distribution. For slug flow, large-sized bubbles develop along the axis and cross subchannel gaps to aggregate into slug shaped bubbles, with a more pronounced distribution of the central peak of void fraction. The experimental data are used to evaluate three drift-flux models. The Bestion’s drift-flux model overestimates the drift velocity, resulting in underestimated void fraction predictions. The Ozaki’s drift-flux model provides more accurate predictions of void fraction than the Xu Han model, with an average relative error of 9.8%.
- two-phase flow,
- wire mesh sensor,
- void fraction,
- bubble size distribution,
- drift-flux model

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	于平安, 朱瑞安, 喻真烷, 等. 核反应堆热工分析[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2002 Yu Ping’an, Zhu Ruian, Yu Zhenwan, et al. Thermal analysis of nuclear reactors[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 2002
[2]	Åbro E, Johansen G A. Improved void fraction determination by means of multibeam gamma-ray attenuation measurements[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1999, 10(2): 99-108. doi: 10.1016/S0955-5986(98)00043-0
[3]	Rahim R A, Rahiman M H F, Chan K S, et al. Non-invasive imaging of liquid/gas flow using ultrasonic transmission-mode tomography[J]. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2007, 135(2): 337-345. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2006.07.031
[4]	Yun B J, Park G C, Julia J E, et al. Flow structure of subcooled boiling water flow in a subchannel of 3×3 rod bundles[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2008, 45(5): 402-422. doi: 10.1080/18811248.2008.9711450
[5]	Hosokawa S, Hayashi K, Tomiyama A. Void distribution and bubble motion in bubbly flows in a 4×4 rod bundle. Part I: experiments[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2014, 51(2): 220-230. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2013.862189
[6]	Ren Quanyao, Pan Liangming, Zhou Wenxiong, et al. Phase distribution characteristics of bubbly flow in 5×5 vertical rod bundles with mixing vane spacer grids[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2018, 96: 451-459. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.04.002
[7]	Yang X, Schlegel J P, Liu Y, et al. Experimental study of interfacial area transport in air–water two phase flow in a scaled 8×8 BWR rod bundle[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2013, 50: 16-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.10.006
[8]	Shen Xiuzhong, Miwa S, Xiao Yigeng, et al. Local measurements of upward air-water two-phase flows in a vertical 6×6 rod bundle[J]. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2019, 1(3): 186-200. doi: 10.1007/s42757-019-0031-0
[9]	Han Xu, Shen Xiuzhong, Yamamoto T, et al. Experimental study on local interfacial parameters in upward air-water bubbly flow in a vertical 6×6 rod bundle[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 144: 118696. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118696
[10]	Prasser H M, Böttger A, Zschau J. A new electrode-mesh tomograph for gas–liquid flows[J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1998, 9(2): 111-119. doi: 10.1016/S0955-5986(98)00015-6
[11]	Ylönen A T. High-resolution flow structure measurements in a rod bundle[D]. Lappeenranta: Lappeenranta University of Technology, 2013.
[12]	Xiong Jinbiao, Xie Hao, Du Sijia, et al. Experimental measurement of bubbly two-phase flow in a 4x4 rod bundle with wire mesh sensor[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2023, 218: 119294. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119294
[13]	王颖龙, 谢浩, 熊进标, 等. 基于丝网传感器的5×5棒束通道空泡分布测量研究[J]. 核动力工程, 2022, 43(1):84-91 Wang Yinglong, Xie Hao, Xiong Jinbiao, et al. Research on void distribution measurement of 5×5 rod bundle channel based on wire mesh sensor[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2022, 43(1): 84-91
[14]	Tomiyama A, Tamai H, Zun I, et al. Transverse migration of single bubbles in simple shear flows[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(11): 1849-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00085-4
[15]	Zhang Hengwei, Xiao Yao, Gu Hanyang. Experimental investigation of two-phase flow evolution in a tight lattice bundle using wire-mesh sensor[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 171: 121079. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121079
[16]	Yan Xu, Xiao Yao, Zhang Hengwei, et al. Experimental investigation of gas-phase migration behaviors in a tight lattice bundle under two-phase non-equilibrium flow[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2023, 282: 119315. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2023.119315
[17]	Prasser H M. Evolution of interfacial area concentration in a vertical air–water flow measured by wire–mesh sensors[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2007, 237(15/17): 1608-1617.
[18]	Zuber N, Findlay J A. Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1965, 87(4): 453-468. doi: 10.1115/1.3689137
[19]	Bestion D. The physical closure laws in the CATHARE code[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1990, 124(3): 229-245. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(90)90294-8
[20]	Ozaki T, Suzuki R, Mashiko H, et al. Development of drift-flux model based on 8×8 BWR rod bundle geometry experiments under prototypic temperature and pressure conditions[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2013, 50(6): 563-580. doi: 10.1080/00223131.2013.785277
[21]	Han Xu, Shen Xiuzhong, Yamamoto T, et al. Flow regime and void fraction predictions in vertical rod bundle flow channels[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 178: 121637. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121637