Research on influencing factors of overpressure discharge load in the primary system of nuclear reactors
-
摘要: 当核反应堆一回路系统发生超压时,可采用超压泄放系统将高温高压流体通过安全阀及下游管道向水池泄放以实现降压,但是安全阀的快速开启会导致流体剧烈释放,可能对管道及水池施加剧烈地瞬态载荷冲击。建立了包括压力容器、管道及水池的系统性分析模型,用于分析管道及水池处的载荷特征。结果表明:超压泄放过程中阀门入口存在水封及开启时间减小会使管道及水池所受载荷峰值增大。喷嘴淹没深度减小或水池截面积增大,水池处载荷峰值减小。Abstract:
Background When the primary system of nuclear reactors experiences overpressure, the overpressure discharge system can be utilized to release high-temperature and high-pressure fluid through the safety valve and downstream pipelines to achieve pressure reduction.Purpose However, the rapid opening of the safety valve can lead to a violent fluid release, which may impose severe transient load impacts on the pipelines and the pool.Methods Analyzing the typical characteristics and influencing factors of the emission phenomenon can provide references for system operation and design. A systematic analysis model including the pressure vessel, pipelines, and water pool was established. The model was finely divided, with the length of the pipeline control body not exceeding 0.3 m, and the water pool was composed of multiple control bodies. The load was solved using the momentum balance method, and calculation results were compared with the EPRI/CE international test data. The established analysis model can quickly obtain the thermal response and load response during the discharge process.Results The results show that during the overpressure discharge process, there is a water seal at the valve inlet and, the opening time reduction will cause the peak load on the pipelines and the water pool to increase.Conclusions A decrease in the nozzle immersion depth or an increase in the water pool cross-sectional area will result in a reduction in the peak load at the water pool.-
Key words:
- overpressure discharge system /
- discharge load /
- discharge pipe /
- pool
-
表 1 管道尺寸表
Table 1. Piping geometric parameters
pipe segment area/m2 length/m direction 1 0.01864 1.6764 horizontal 2 0.01864 1.8288 vertical 2 0.06557 4.5720 vertical 3 0.06557 13.2283 horizontal 4 0.06557 0.4572 vertical -
[1] Shang Zhengrun, Lv Dufeng, Meng Zhaoming, et al. Depressurization behavior and strategy of automatic depressurization system for AP1000[C]//Proceedings of 2024 31st International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. 2024: V009T11A011. [2] Shang Zhengrun, Lv Dufeng, Yu Pei, et al. Research on operating characteristics of AP1000 automatic depressurization system under typical accident condition[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2024, 206: 110657. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110657 [3] Sun D C, Tian W X, Qiu S Z, et al. Scaling analysis of AP1000 ADS-4 entrainment and depressurization[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2014, 74: 71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.01.019 [4] Cho S, Park C K, Kim H Y, et al. Air clearing oscillation produced by APR1400 prototype sparger[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 2002 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. 2002: 23-30. [5] Park C K, Cho S, Song C H, et al. Unit cell sparger test program and preliminary test results for APR1400[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 2002 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. 2002: 39-45. [6] Jo J C. Numerical simulation of pressure transients in a PWR main steam line system due to quick operations of pressure relief valve[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. 2009: 35-43. [7] Yu S O, Jo J C. Analysis on transient piping pressure and force caused by high pressure steam flow disturbances[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2007, 237(3): 260-267. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.06.010 [8] 王建平. AP1000自动卸压系统第1、2、3级优化研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2018Wang Jianping. Research on the optimization of AP1000 ADS stage 1, 2, and 3[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2018 [9] Stubbe E J, VanHoenacker L, Otero R. RELAP5/MOD3 assessment for calculation of safety and relief valve discharge piping hydrodynamic loads[R]. NUREG/IA-0093, 1994. [10] 吴丹, 付冉, 王燕萍, 等. 两相排放载荷分析方法研究[J]. 核动力工程, 2015, 36(2): 160-164Wu Dan, Fu Ran, Wang Yanping, et al. Study on analysis method for two phase discharge force[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2015, 36(2): 160-164 [11] Lim J. RELAP5 analysis of hydrodynamic loads in response to PORV actuation[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2018, 115: 459-465. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2018.02.023 [12] Cho S, Song C H, Park C K, et al. Air clearing pressure oscillation produced in a quenching tank by a prototype unit cell sparger of the APR1400[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2008, 238(7): 1525-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.12.001 [13] Park C K, Song C H. Influence of key parameters on the APR1400 in-containment refueling water storage tank hydrodynamic loads[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2003, 40(10): 820-826. doi: 10.1080/18811248.2003.9715424 [14] Park C K, Song C H, Jun H G. Experimental investigation of the steam condensation phenomena due to a multi-hole sparger[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2007, 44(4): 548-557. doi: 10.1080/18811248.2007.9711844 [15] Rayleigh L. VIII. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity[J]. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1917, 34(200): 94-98. doi: 10.1080/14786440808635681 -